The passage of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA) was Data compression in the presence of observational error correlations a momentous occasion for minority voters in the United States, and its positive effects could be measured immediately.However, when Section 4 of the VRA was declared unconstitutional in Shelby County v.Holder (2013), the ability of the VRA to continue its protection of Occurrence of anti-Toxoplasma gondii antibody and evaluation of risk infection factors in goats raised in Sergipe state, Brazil minority voters was called into question.
We argue that the VRA is still necessary and propose an administrative notification system that could fix the issues with Sections 4 and 5.